You Turned Out Like Everybody Else – Sadiq Abacha Writes Open Letter To Prof. Wole Soyinka

If you want to think, speak and act logically then you should know all three.

1. The law of identity
2. The law of excluded middle
3. The law of non contradiction.

Now let’s look at each one of these and see what they mean in practice.

1. The law of identity
The law of identity means that things are what they are, which at first doesn’t seem very illuminating, but wait; it implies also the following, that things are what they are, whether you like them or not, it implies that things are what they are whether you know them or not, it implies that things are what they are whether you agree with them or not. However, if you don’t like the facts as they are you are going to have to put up with them, because facts are what they are, if it’s raining on your golf day, get used to it! Because the facts are what they are and are often not what you want them to be, like if the traffic lights turn red when you approach, stop complaining! The law of identity means that you must adapt yourself to the facts and start your work from there, it implies that the facts will not bend to meet your expectations. You must first adapt yourself to what life is and then get to work changing and improving things in your life, be brave to meet reality as it really is and not how you would wish it to be.

2. The law of excluded middle
The law of excluded middle means that you should give a straight yes or no answer always and there is no middle ground. The law means that there is no kinda yes and kinda no, there is no ‘sort of’ being married because you are either married or you are not, you are either a thief or you are not, you are either on time or not, you are either living in Nigeria or you are not. The law is the idea that you should not try to keep all of your options open by staying in the middle or hedging, when it suits you, like when you accepted an appointment during IBB’s regime as chairman of FRSC. I bet that was a military regime you partook in. Please pick one wife and state your claim 100% to her, pick one idea and go for it 100%! Decide and commit Sir! There you might find great power and self satisfaction in the doctrine of decide and commit. No half way measures, no middle ground, exclude the middle! Here! The law of excluded middle Sir.

3. The law of non contradiction
The law of non contradiction says don’t contradict yourself simple. If you say you will be there then be there. If you say you will do it then do it. Don’t say or fight for one thing and then do the opposite. Don’t say one thing and then later deny that you said it. Don’t say one thing and then later contradict it. Be consistent in your thoughts and actions. Observing someone who was a socialist in the morning but then became a capitalist in the evening is a textbook on contradiction, these are two polar opposites, such a person is clearly inconsistent and is therefore considered a flip flop, confused, easily led or misled or at best a lunatic who has no clear understanding of the basis of either doctrine.

Apply these three logics to others with consistency and then you can ask for the same or expect the same from others, and then you can also ask for others to deal with facts not fantasy, which is the law of identity. Ask others to make up their mind to decide and commit. The law of excluded middle.Then ask others to follow through on the things that they say they would do. The law of non contradiction.

Sir, I believe brilliance is not perfection. I have grown and watched you criticize regime after regime and at that young and naive age I was thinking why wouldn’t this man just contest to be president so that Nigeria can be saved, I would have defiantly voted for Mr Soyinka if it would have brought an end to Nigeria’s woes. To my utter surprise, I heard about your FRSC leadership and how funds were misused and a great deal of it unaccounted for. “Oh my God! In the end he turned out to be just the same as everybody else” were my next thoughts. My hopes for you, all ended up in great disappointment.

Here I find myself defending my father 15 years after his death because some of you have no one else to pounce on, or rather, you have chosen a dead person to keep pouncing on over and over again when you have more than an array of contestants.  A coward’s act I believe.  ”A common writer” is what I have heard you being referred to lately, and I believe a mature mind would now agree to such referrals. With all due respect, there is a great challenge that faces the country, we have to put our heads together, rather than clashing, our collective ships must sail in the same direction, let us leave the ghosts of past contention and face the future bravely as one, criticizing the past does not help the present or define a path to the future.

You say, with the weight of your sense of history and the authority you possess on national issues that ” a vicious usurper under whose authority the lives of an elected president and his wife were snuffed out” referring to my late father, you must be growing old, or you would rightly recall that that president elect you refer to did not die while my father was alive. Did you slyly change your facts to fit a history that would better serve your narrative, or are you just plain forgetful? Either way, it shows you are losing your grasp of reality.

Comparing my father’s leadership to Boko Haram’s current reign of terror,  is a rather cheap shot, you are in no position to examine, judge and sentence an entire regime based on the information you think you have, you are privy to almost none of the true facts, what is at your disposal is at best, hearsay, or were you ever minister of defence? Did you ever sit in during security meetings, evaluate the facts and subtleties of national security? You remind me of Obama criticizing the Republicans before he became a sitting president himself, vouching to put an end to all American occupation, this all came to an abrupt end once he had access to the briefs and security issues, economic and political, facing his nation. Surely he did what he could, and history will judge him. To lead is not to be a rock star, and to be a Nobel Laureate is not to be an antagonist of this country’s legacy. We are Africa’s leader, whether we like it or not, we cannot trivialize the centenary celebration, it happens only once, let us come together, if only for this one occasion and agree to disagree.

Open rebellion against the current government at this time, on the manner of the centenary celebrations, for whatever reason, is tactless, it is not about you, it is about our nation, our beloved country. There is a time and place for everything. My late father was a Nigerian, lived in Nigeria and died protecting our interests to the best of his ability, critiquing placing him on the honor roll, along with many deserving dignitaries is your right, you have the right to your own opinions, but you do not have the right to your own facts. Facts stand alone, regardless of who espouses them, let posterity judge, but you are clearly politicizing a dead issue, how could you not be? Having an issue with the naming of a hospital after the late General and leader? Really? Now?

It almost seems as if you want to turn back the hands of time, what else would you like to undo besides the naming of the hospital, would you like to unmake Bayelsa state, Zamfara state or the others?  What about the advances we made in commerce, reducing the inflation rate, what about security and welfare, how many projects, hospitals and schools were created? inflation went from 54% to 8.5%! my father oversaw an increase in our foreign currency reserves from 494 million dollars in 1993 to 9.6 billion dollars by the middle of 1997, that is unprecedented , 15 years after the PTF the benefits are still being reaped today in Nigeria, What of peace keeping and nation building, not just in West Africa but the entire continent, restoring democracy in Liberia and Sierra Leone, all these under my father’s leadership, are all these not laudable? Or would you like to undo them all. All this on 8$ per barrel of oil! You have to be kidding me.

You are a learned man, you would have to undo all your learning to knowingly wish to undo all these achievements! I will be the first to proclaim that my fathers leadership was not pitch perfect or spot free, that does not exist, maybe in utopia but not here on this earth, so let us keep our discourse set in the sphere of reality please, he deserves the award, and he did not campaign for it, let it go, Sir…and allow Nigeria to at least bask in our survival and endurance in our growing prosperity and development in these trying times. I have been accused of being an optimist, hence, I am optimistic that you will come around and accept that we can all come together and face the future together, forgive each other our wrongs while celebrating our rights, I am still an admirer of your works after all, however, I cannot and will not attempt to answer your every charge, this is not the time or place, this is a time for solidarity, if only you were wise enough to grasp this.

I applaud the patience of President Goodluck Jonathan and his composure and restraint in not having a knee jerk reaction at such a pivotal moment in our nations history, but you would mar the occasion, Sir, in the future, please pick your battles, and do better to safeguard your relevance,  Enough Sir!

Views expressed are solely the author’s

About the author


In the beginning...Let there be Light

  • Amin

    Impressive letter! Abacha’s was very cautious in selecting of words use to address the aging Prof. Soyinka. But, to be very sincere to Prof. Soyinka as to Abacha’s, He Soyinka is taking the Abacha issue with bitterness ignoring the Abacha accomplishments to his own ego and selfishness. It’s true that, Late Abacha was not the best President at same time he was not least. If Abacha were to be alive today, most of this echoes will not have come and this is were Abacha’s family finds prof. Soyinka’s words insulting to them and their late father. Let it go Professor or test your own mighty by contesting the seat of the President if you think; words and reputation are all that is needed to govern a country.

  • Nurah

    Well like he said *Fact are facts* Facts on ground show that during the Abacha regime, Nigeria basked in the glory of being called a developing nation. Now we shamefully accept that we are an underdeveloping nation. Besides Soyinka should stick to literature and not involve himself in politics just the way Chinua Achebe did.

  • sunny

    Gray hair they say is not wisdom. How can a Professor of Soyinka’s calibre accused Abacha of killing Abiola when Abacha died before Abiola. Somtimes I wonder if people forget so soon or they are delibrately causing trouble with their ultrances. To think that Soyinka, Fela’s family & Gani’s family rejected their awards because of Abaccha is dissapionting. Is Abacha the one that is giving them the award? Will it not be disasterous if Jonathan awards the other past president and leaves Abacha out? Sometimes I wonder what these old men really want from this country. Thank God the centinary celebration was a huge success without them. Nigeria will survive.

  • Olatunji Ope

    I find the comments here quite amusing. I can only conclude that you are all Sadiqs friends or just being mischievious. Whatever you say about Professor Soyinka is absolutely irrelevant in the scheme of things. Amin, i am quite sure that a lot more people would still be on exile, were Abacha to be alive so you are quite right. Abachas accomplishments? That is hilarious. I guess you are comparing the disaster that is GEJ with Abacha, right? That is really funny, oh my goodness. Prof is egotistic and selfish? You need to work on that one. Nurah, Nigeria basked in the glory of being called a developing nation? Really? I guess you believe that Nigerians are dense or afflicted by collective amnesia.

    Sunny, i am sure that the Prof meant to deliberately cause trouble with his ULTRANCES. “Will it not be disasterous if Jonathan awards the other past president and leaves Abacha out? Sometimes I wonder what these old men really want from this country. Thank God the centinary celebration was a huge success without them”. Seriously?

  • Amin

    Sweet of you to heard you calling us names. But, poor you to think I must be a friend to sadiq to write what I said. I stand by my words, and it’s left to you and your likes to say/think rationale. I repeat, With President Goodluck Jonathan in action and others before him – Late. Gen. Sani Abacha is not the worst president!

  • Joseph

    Well said. You did make some very good points. Even though I believe Wole Soyinka also had every right to refuse the award, I also believe he should let sleeping dogs lie. The man is dead. Why should he keep on talking about him. I’m not supporting what Abacha did while he was alive but that doesn’t negate the fact that he was a human being like you and I. We seem to forget that we have so-called leaders who perpetrate atrocities but hide behind their hirelings and thugs. Is Nigeria any better off now Abacha is gone ? After all, whatever he did, he couldn’t have accomplished it alone. We still have people who were around and known associates from his era and nothing has been done about them.

  • Bunmi

    Sorry man! I dnt av d patient to read ur epistle. Meanwhile picking on ur 2nd law; I totally agree. its either its gud or bad and ur father was bad no two ways to it. So just forget abt his achievements. And again u said dey pick on a dead man. No! U got it twisted,dead r always remembered and talked abt but their deeds speak for them bt unfortunately ur father’s evil deeds are enoumous and such continue to get criticized sometimes foreva. So get used to it and take hrt. On a second note Prof. Soyinka is too big for u to take on.

    Also, av u seen @ayosogunro reply to dis letter? U really need to read it.

  • Muazu

    Facts are facts and they are documented.It’s allowed to criticise others.Even though people are being criticize on a particular issue forgetting the goods they have achieved .People often criticize Abacha as being dictatorial.Come on has there been any military president that is not dictatorial?I guess not.You see Abacha is someone I respect a lot because during his regime,Nigeria excise sovereignty which is needed for development.Just like the author pointed out,our reserve was robust;fuel price was less than twelve naira,nine to be precise;states were created;PTF projects spread across the federation speerheaded by another man I respected(Buhari).If Abacha was dictatorial,will Buhari be able to deliver in PTF?Only few amongs us are righteous,but a large number are waiting for our own opportunity to still.The man stole from Nigeria but there are things he left behind that we are still benefiting from.Let me shift a bit to El-Rufai.People say all sought of things about him given a plot or plots of lands to his family.Who will not?But even with that,El-Rufai will always be remember for the things he has done.I salute him.Why was IBB NOT called a thief by Mr.Soyinka.About $11.5b gulf oil money during his regime?Or the recent $20 under the present administration.Why are they not call thieves.My conclusion is let do what we can to be better than the past.And we shuold avoid sectionalism when it comes to issues that affect our dear country Nigeria.Because it is the only place we have to call our own.

  • If his dad is really great, he won’t be humiliated week after getting the so-called award.

  • presley

    I read all these comments but I can infer that most writers were young under Abacha including the son otherwise they would have known Abacha was a llunatic of the highest order either dead or alive. A hopeless regime only compared to animal kingdom bestiality. Inhuman like this present regime. Then Prof has all audacity to talk about Abacha. If Abacha’s son or anybody has access to a Tell interview granted by Prof when he was in exile in UK six months before Abacha’s death, they’ll know Soyinka knows more than all Abacha’s ministers….